The Old Fool welcomes you
Recent posts and comments, archives of past posts, and categories of the posts are listed on the right of the opening page. If you ever wonder how my posts are written, click here.
Bookmark www.oldmennonfools.com or Click here to subscribe to receive email notice of new posts. Email addresses are not sold or shared.
To better know me, go to my life and the longer articles named on the black ribbon above. Browse, comment and question as you wish. We journey on together in the pilgrimage of life and faith.
I haven’t written much recently because among other things I’ve had a bout with the flu. One night I began to feel unwell and I pushed my “help” button. The Greencroft attendant that responded saw that I was in distress. She asked if I wanted her to call my daughter, and I said yes. Rachel came and asked if I wanted the ambulance to take me to the hospital. Again I answered with a yes.
The hospital ran a series of tests. When I told the doctor that the large muscles in my legs and thighs were hurting he said that that’s the flu. I was kept in the hospital for several days and then I was transferred to the therapy rehab at Greencroft. The physical and occupational therapists brought me back to near normal.
So, now I am at home in Apt 83. The therapists instructed me to never be far from my “wheels”. I use a walker to move about the Apt., go to the dining room and get my mail. Being slowed by the flu I am also moving along in the aging process. On March 14 of this year I became 92 years old. By then I was able to accept Rachel’s invitation to spend the next Sunday afternoon at her home for a small open house to receive family members.
The residents of Evergreen have been introduced to Stephenie Maupin, a new and licensed director of Assisted Living. I was fascinated when I learned that she milked six goats each morning before coming to work. That is a part of her part in the family business. Go the her family website by clicking here.
Weeks have gone by since I wrote the above paragraphs. It is now mid-April but the forecasts seem to indicate that our hope spring to come will soon be fulfilled.
Today in the Elkhart Truth there is an obituary of an Anna Martin who died at 95. She had 6 sons and 5 daughters and is survived by 82 grandchilren, 316 great grandchildren, and 16 great grandchildren. She was an Old Order Mennonite who was born in Pennsylvania and died in Indiana. What a life that must have been.
Now that I’ve shared the insights of my contrarian friend on the word “genius” and whether it can be applied to me, or to God, I wish to add some thoughts of my own. But cautiously, for Paul warned Timothy against quarreling about words which in his opinion is valueless. (2. Timothy 2:14)
First: I agree that a dictionary is a good first place to study a word. However, there are differences among dictionaries. Some are collegiate, others are on a high school level with simpler definitions. Dictionaries like translations of the Bible should be compared and contrasted.
The compilers of dictionaries are aware that the context shapes the meaning to a word. That is true of all words; no final meaning without a context. So my anonimos friend had his dictionary, but he did ask me what I meant by genius, and it did not occur to me to ask the man who called me an old genius what he meant by the term.
I accept the verdict that I am a follower. I don’t think it is a bad thing to be a follower especially if it means that I am able to adopt and adapt to those to whom I am accountable. I was somewhat submissive to and honored my father and the Lancaster Conference bishop board. I was more attentive to the wishes of the local congregations in my district than to a Bishop Board a thousand miles away. A conservative bishop traveled to the Southeast and reported to another that the farther south you go the worse it gets.
More than any other motivation, I have wanted to be a follower of Jesus. My text for my first florida sermon centered on what is found in 2. Corinthians 2:2 Paul was determined to know nothing in Corinth except Jesus Christ. In this I have followed Paul as he followed Jesus. This is the theme of my life and like Paul, I am counted a fool by the world for doing so.
Now as for the God of the Bible, no idol image was allowed, yet many anthropomorphisms were needed to make an Unknowable One more understandable. An anthropomorphism is the attribution of a human form, human characteristics, or human behavior to nonhuman things as to a deity or an animal. To say that God has a better than genius-like brain is not more blasphemous than to speak of the face of God is blasphemy.
I send this out on MLK day after attending the Goshen College Convocation on this morning. The speaker was Leonard dow from eastern Pennsylvania. You may hear his Sunday morning sermon at College Mennonite Church by clicking here. Scroll forward for 38 minutes to enter at the beginning of the sermon.
I have a friend who is appropriately an0nymous to all but me. He writes letters to me and sends them by snail mail. I honor him for being an honest and faithful friend and the forthright critic that he is. He wrote the following to me:
May the Lord fill your life with love, joy, peace, and grace.
The subject today is genius. Specifically, in what way it might apply to you. Let us begin with a definition, in this case from the New Oxford American Dictionary.
“GENIUS: exceptional intellectual or creative power of other natural ability; a person who is exceptionally intelligent or creative, either generally or in some particular respect.”
Certainly, no serious observer would contest that your intelligence is clearly above average. But exceptional? Hardly. Then, can you be classified as exceptionally creative? You know, someone who has proposed whole new ways of viewing and/or understanding the universe and all that is in it (or at the least some significant part of parts thereof). Einstein and Darwin are extreme examples.
Or even John Howard Yoder, who for decades was considered the world’s premier Anabaptist theologian, but whose “genius” may in fact have been more the ability to wrap his notions in such obtuse and convoluted verbiage that he seemed to be saying things extremely profound.
My take on Martin Lehman is one more of a follower, a person who adopts and adapts his thinking to those who he believes at any one time to have a hold on the ‘truth’. Thus, you were a once a staunch defender of the beliefs of your father. And then of the Lancaster Conference bishop board. And now you identify with so-called intellectuals and academics who reject as utter foolishness most of what you formerly believed, taught, and defended.
Sorry, but there seems to be nothing in the writings of the Old Fool (in my memories of your preaching) that in any way plows new ground, but instead has been proposed and developed previously by others. There’s nothing necessarily wrong about that, but it is not genius as defined above.
While to your credit, you rejected the title of genius, your re-visiting of the concept in several columns suggest you enjoy, at least a bit, the thought that someone might think you are one.
Now to the question of whether God can be rightly called a genius? And thus, whether all humans, since the Bible says we are created in God’s image, can in some sense be said to be geniuses? First of all, ‘genius’ is a human attribute and to apply it to God seems to me somewhat anthropomorphic and thus at the least inappropriate. And second, doing so may even be blasphemous. Thus, I think not.
A joyous 2018 to you and yours. (S) by my an0nymous friend