Genius revisited

Now that I’ve shared the insights of my contrarian friend on the word “genius” and whether it can be applied to me, or to God, I wish to add some thoughts of my own.  But cautiously, for Paul  warned Timothy  against quarreling about words which in his opinion is valueless.  (2. Timothy 2:14)

First: I agree that a dictionary is a good first place to study a word. However, there are differences among dictionaries. Some are collegiate, others are on a high school level with simpler definitions.  Dictionaries like translations of the Bible should be compared and contrasted.

The compilers of  dictionaries are aware that the context shapes the meaning to a word. That is true of all words; no final meaning without a context. So my anonimos friend had his dictionary, but he did ask me what I meant by genius, and it did not occur to me to ask the man who called me an old genius what he meant by the term.

I accept the verdict that I am a follower. I don’t think it is a bad thing to be a follower especially if it means that I am able to adopt and adapt to those to whom I am accountable.  I was somewhat submissive to and honored my father and the Lancaster Conference bishop board.  I was more attentive to the wishes of the local congregations in my district than to a Bishop Board a thousand miles away.  A conservative bishop traveled to the Southeast and reported to another that the farther south you go the worse it gets.

More than any other motivation, I have wanted to be a follower of Jesus.  My text for my first florida sermon centered on what is found in 2. Corinthians 2:2   Paul was determined to know nothing in Corinth except Jesus Christ.  In this I have followed Paul as he followed Jesus.  This is the theme of my life and like Paul, I am counted a fool by the world for doing so.

Now as for the God of the Bible, no idol image was allowed, yet many anthropomorphisms were needed  to make an Unknowable One more understandable. An anthropomorphism is the attribution of a human form, human characteristics, or human behavior to nonhuman things as  to a deity or an animal.   To say that God has a better than genius-like brain is not more blasphemous than to speak of the face of God is blasphemy.

I send this out on MLK day after attending the Goshen College Convocation on this morning.  The speaker was Leonard dow from eastern Pennsylvania.  You may hear his Sunday morning sermon at College Mennonite Church by clicking here.  Scroll forward for 38 minutes to enter at the beginning of the sermon.

About Martin Lehman

I was born 92 years ago, the son of a Mennonite pastor and organic gardener in Franklin County, Pennsylvania. At age 10 I was baptized as a member of the Marion Mennonite Church. I own the "Old Fool" moniker because I want to walk the Jesus Way even though the world and much of the church takes me as a fool for doing so. In my life I have moved from being a young conservative to an elderly radical. I tell that story in My Faith Journey posted on my website.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Genius revisited

  1. Mary Bontrager says:

    About leading and following. I heard someone say that we should “Lead, follow, or get
    out of the way”. I also heard someone say, “Neither a leader nor a follower be”. I think
    I am in individual person trying to “Follow the path of Jesus”, in whatever way I can.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.